Xossip

Go Back Xossip > Technology> Computers, Gadgets & Gizmos > Which is Better Display for handsets ?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 1st October 2017
jonnyhandsome jonnyhandsome is offline
 
Join Date: 20th November 2007
Posts: 859
Rep Power: 25 Points: 857
jonnyhandsome has received several accoladesjonnyhandsome has received several accoladesjonnyhandsome has received several accoladesjonnyhandsome has received several accolades
Which is Better Display for handsets ?

which is better display in handset TFT ,AMOLED or Super AMOLED ? I got this which i m copy pasting here . "The biggest disadvantage that AMOLED has is the shorter lifespan of the screen compared to TFT. Each pixel in the display degrades with each second that it is lit and even more so the brighter it is. Despite improvements on the lifetime of AMOLED displays, AMOLED still only lasts a fraction of the lifetime of a TFT display. With that said, an AMOLED display is able to outlast the usable lifetime of the device before parts of it start to degrade."
Need experts views on this .



Reply With Quote
Have you seen the announcement yet?
  #2  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
prince singhaniya prince singhaniya is offline
 
Join Date: 26th October 2017
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 1 Points: 1
prince singhaniya is an unknown quantity at this point
i think qhd IPS display is also a great display I am using it qhd means 4 times better display and resolution it also available in cheap android mobile ..

Reply With Quote
Have you seen the announcement yet?
  #3  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
tobermory's Avatar
tobermory tobermory is offline
 
Join Date: 2nd May 2014
Posts: 898
Rep Power: 10 Points: 1292
tobermory is a pillar of our communitytobermory is a pillar of our communitytobermory is a pillar of our communitytobermory is a pillar of our communitytobermory is a pillar of our communitytobermory is a pillar of our community
A display is as cool as it appears to your eye. I hate my Google Pixel display and used to love GS3 ... go figure. So far as shorter lifespan is concerned, these days, any Android would be outdated (and practically useless as a smartphone) in 5 years and every display will outlive the Android OS version. iOS probably does better on that front.
______________________________
Jack n' Jill went up the Hill
God knows what went up there
Jill came down screaming i-pill i-pill

Last edited by tobermory : 2 Weeks Ago at 02:52 PM.

Reply With Quote
Have you seen the announcement yet?
  #4  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
fourier21 fourier21 is offline
 
Join Date: 1st November 2017
Posts: 10
fourier21 has disabled reputations
..

Last edited by fourier21 : 2 Weeks Ago at 11:49 PM.

Reply With Quote
Have you seen the announcement yet?
  #5  
Old 4 Days Ago
AdventureGuy's Avatar
AdventureGuy AdventureGuy is offline
 
Join Date: 5th September 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 681
Rep Power: 11 Points: 723
AdventureGuy has received several accoladesAdventureGuy has received several accoladesAdventureGuy has received several accolades
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobermory View Post
A display is as cool as it appears to your eye. I hate my Google Pixel display and used to love GS3 ... go figure. So far as shorter lifespan is concerned, these days, any Android would be outdated (and practically useless as a smartphone) in 5 years and every display will outlive the Android OS version. iOS probably does better on that front.
fuck lg and their quality control. My g3 came with warm display. on searching the net, found out two batches of screens were made for g3 and one batch was little warm whereas another was cool

replaced thru official service center and the new one also had warm display. sold off within 2 days.

Reply With Quote
Have you seen the announcement yet?
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:57 PM.
Page generated in 0.02556 seconds